While the competition was open to any calibre, any manufacturer who submitted a candidate weapon that was not chambered for 5.56×45mm NATO and / or 7.62×51mm NATO was required to provide 500,000 rounds of test ammunition. The key requirements were improved accuracy, reliability and durability the capability to fire semi-automatic single shots and fully automatic bursts (instead of 3-round bursts) an integrated rail system to accept MIL-STD-1913 accessories and fully ambidextrous controls. The aim of this program was to select a new weapon to replace the US Army’s existing M4 carbine. In 2010, the US Army announced a new small arms initiative called the Improved Individual Carbine (IC) Competition
The US Army’s M16 / M4 assault rifle family has been in service for 50 years, longer than any other service rifle. The Improved Individual Carbine Competition (IICC)
Which is more accurate standard ammo vs nato drivers#
These are likely to impact the UK and other NATO armies, so it may be worth assessing what they propose to achieve.īefore doing so, a review existing initiatives seeks to provide an understanding of the context and thinking behind the USA’s small arms strategy and the drivers of future technology in this area. In fact, they have now been superseded by two new programs that will commence in early 2014 – the Combat Lightweight Automatic Weapon System (CLAWS) and the Lightweight Dismounted Automatic Machine-gun (LDAM). At the beginning of this year, it became apparent that both initiatives were unlikely to lead to a new system being adopted. Since the beginning of the new millennium, US future small arms development has been focused on two separate programs: the Improved Individual Carbine Competition (IICC) and the Lightweight Small Arms Technology (LSAT) programs. Two new US new small arms research programs suggest that this may be the case.
0 kommentar(er)
